Well you have to admit it makes sense. Why would you want to be dependent on imports from another country anyway. Yet, we have been doing this for some time now. OPEC has been setting the cap where they want it, this keeps us handicapped and dependent. This regularly causes inflated prices. It’s time the U.S. take measures to protect our economy from imposed shortages by OPEC and the inflated gas and oil prices caused by it.
Obama Urges Opening Up Oil Reserves
By Perry Bacon Jr. and Michael D. Shear
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, August 5, 2008; A04
LANSING, Mich., Aug. 4 — Sen. Barack Obama called Monday for using oil from the nation’s strategic reserves to lower gasoline prices, the second time in less than a week that he has modified a position on energy issues, as he and Sen. John McCain seek to find solutions to a topic that is increasingly dominating the presidential race.
In a speech here, Obama outlined a plan to reduce an addiction to foreign oil that he said is “one of the most dangerous and urgent threats this nation has ever faced.” He repeated his call for a $1,000 “energy rebate” for low- and middle-income families that would be paid for by a windfall-profits tax on oil companies.
The Obama campaign did not predict how much releasing reserves would lower gas prices. But it said prices at the pump went down more than 19 percent within two weeks when President Bill Clinton made such a move in 2000.
His proposal comes a month after Obama said he would consider using oil from the reserves only in a “genuine emergency,” such as “terrorist acts.” Aides said the plan is not a reversal because he would replace light crude oil in the reserves with less-expensive heavy crude. They also noted that the senator from Illinois last week described the country’s economic conditions as an “emergency.”
The Bush administration said it opposed using oil from the reserves when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called for it last month. McCain mocked the idea on Monday.
The proposal, along with Obama’s comments last week that he would consider expanding offshore drilling as part of a comprehensive energy bill, illustrated how both candidates are trying to find quick fixes to $4-a-gallon gas and other rising energy costs. McCain had also opposed additional offshore drilling until reversing his position in June, and he has called for a suspension of the federal gas tax.
But their proposals reflect a problem both candidates face: There are few ways to dramatically reduce gas prices, even as voters demand solutions.
Obama emphasized on Monday that using reserves is a temporary fix and that drilling is not “a particularly meaningful short-term or long-term solution.” McCain has said that drilling would have a “psychological” benefit for consumers; his proposal to suspend the 18-cent-a-gallon federal gas tax was ignored by lawmakers on Capitol Hill and criticized by economists, who said it would not lead to a noticeable change in prices.
On the stump, McCain talks frequently about electric power, a subject that energy experts say will do little to affect gas prices. His plan to build 45 nuclear power plants, which he will highlight with a visit to a Michigan plant Tuesday, would take decades.
McCain’s aides said Obama’s proposal to tap the nation’s oil reserves amounts to his second position on the issue in a month. McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said the idea is “not a substitute for a real plan.”
“The strategic oil reserve exists for America’s national security strategy, not Barack Obama’s election strategy,” Bounds said.
At a small-business forum near Philadelphia on Monday, McCain called on Obama to insist that Congress return from its August recess to confront high gas prices and the energy crisis. He urged immediate drilling off the nation’s coast.
“We have to drill here and drill now. Not wait and see if there’s areas to explore, not wait and see if there’s a package to put together,” he said. “But drill here and drill now.”
McCain has aired ads attacking Obama’s positions on drilling. On Monday, Obama responded with an ad blasting his GOP rival for accepting millions in contributions from oil company executives and for advocating a corporate tax cut that would reduce taxes on oil companies.
In his speech, Obama pledged to eliminate the need for oil from the Middle East and Venezuela within 10 years by growing alternative sources of energy and through conservation.
His long-term energy plan includes creating a million 150-mile-per gallon plug-in hybrid vehicles within six years; requiring that 10 percent of U.S. energy come from renewable resources by the end of his first term; and reducing U.S. demand for electricity by 15 percent by 2030.
Obama said he would give a $7,000 tax credit to those who buy plug-in hybrid cars. They won’t be mass-produced until 2010, but aides said the candidate wants to encourage carmakers to move toward producing more energy-efficient vehicles.
“I want the fuel-efficient cars of tomorrow to be built — not in Japan, not in China, but here in the United States of America, here in Michigan,” Obama said to loud applause.
McCain has said he would invest $2 billion in clean coal technology and has offered a $300 million prize to whoever invents the next-generation electric motor for cars. He would give a $5,000 tax credit to those who buy cars that produce less pollution.
Obama’s shifts on offshore drilling and using the petroleum reserve come as polls show that large majorities back increased drilling to reduce gas prices.
The issue is complicated for the Democrat, as many environmental groups are eager to see Americans drive less and are sharply opposed to increased drilling. Friends of the Earth, an environmental group that endorsed Obama in May, said in a statement that “it’s so disappointing to see Obama now say he would consider expanding offshore drilling, even though he knows it is not a real solution to the energy crisis.”
Obama has also suggested Americans could save money on gas by fully inflating their tires — something that police departments and other government agencies across the country have done to conserve fuel.
The McCain campaign has ridiculed Obama, saying it is a tiny solution to the gas problem. On his plane Monday, McCain’s staff handed reporters tire gauges with the words “OBAMA ENERGY PLAN” stamped on them.
Shear was traveling with McCain. Staff writer Juliet Eilperin contributed to this report from Montana.
var comments_url = “http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/04/AR2008080400477_Comments.html” ;
var article_id = “AR2008080400477″ ;
<!–
var COMMENTS_ALLOWED = false ;
var COMMENTS_ACTIVE = false ;
var comments_period = ( typeof wp_article != “undefined” && typeof wp_article.comments_period != “undefined” && ( wp_article.comments_period != “” || wp_article.comments_period == “0″ ) && wp_article.comments_period >= 0 ) ? wp_article.comments_period : 3 ;
articleCommentsUrl = document.location.href;
if ( typeof comments_url == ‘undefined’ ) {
var article_pathname = document.location.pathname;
var comments_url = article_pathname.split(“.”)[0]+”_Comments.”+article_pathname.split(“.”)[1];
}
if ( typeof article_id == ‘undefined’ ) {
var article_id = articleCommentsUrl.split(“/”).pop();
var article_id = article_id.split(“.”)[0];
article_id = article_id.replace(/(.*)_(\d+|\w+)/, function(match,submatch1,offset,string) { return submatch1; } ) ;
}
function checkDaysOld(daysOld) {
var todayString = ‘August 05, 2008′;
var today = new Date(todayString).getTime();
var daysOld = 86400 * daysOld * 1000;
var pubDate = document.getElementById(“pubDate”);
if(pubDate != null) {
pubDate = pubDate.getAttribute(“value”);
return (today – pubDate > daysOld )?true:false;
} else {
return false;
}
}
if ( typeof thisNode == ‘undefined’ )
thisNode = ‘admin’ ;
cmt_ancestor = thisNode.split(‘/’)[0] ;
// (black list) && (white list) of ancestors and sections goes here
if ( !( thisNode.match(/\/wires$/) || thisNode.match(/^artsandliving\/(entertainmentguide|entertainmentnews|travel\/index)($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^business\/(portfolio)($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^metro\/(obituaries)($|\/)/) )
&&
( thisNode.match(/^(artsandliving|business|cars|education|health|jobs|media|metro|nation|realestate|religion|politics|sports|technology|world|kidspost|media)($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^print\/(washpostmagazine|style|sundayarts|sundaysource)($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^opinions($|\/)/) || thisNode.match(/^opinion\/(columns)($|\/)/) ))
{
COMMENTS_ALLOWED = true ;
if(!checkDaysOld(comments_period) ) {
document.write(“<style>#ArticleCommentsWrapper {display:block};</style>”);
COMMENTS_ACTIVE = true ;
} else {
document.write(‘<p class=”posted”><a href=”‘+comments_url+’”>View all comments</a> that have been posted about this article.</p>’);
}
} else {
document.write(”);
}
// –>
<!–
function getDisplayUserName()
{
var output = ‘Your washingtonpost.com User ID’ ;
//check to the see if the user is signed in
if (document.cookie.indexOf(“wpniuser”) != -1)
{
var start = (document.cookie.indexOf(“wpniuser”) + 9) ;
var end = (document.cookie.indexOf(“;”,start)) == -1 ? document.cookie.length : document.cookie.indexOf(“;”,start) ;
cookieuser = document.cookie.substring(start,end) ;
// show their username and registration links
if ( cookieuser.indexOf(“@”) != -1)
cookieuser = cookieuser.substring(0,cookieuser.indexOf(“@”)) ;
// cookieuser = cookieuser.trim() ;
if ( cookieuser )
output += (‘, ‘+cookieuser+’,') ;
}
output += ‘ will be displayed with your comment.’ ;
return output ;
}
// –>
<!–
if ( typeof otto != “undefined” ) {
otto.placeGlobalOttoTest() ;
}
// –>
1 response so far ↓
jeffroensch2008 // August 6, 2008 at 7:10 am |
The only energy or oil monopoly in this country is a governmental institutionalized monopoly on our country energy market. The legislative branch has been engaging in anti-competitive energy practices from drilling to building new refineries and much more. They are in clear violation of the
“Sherman Antitrust Act
This Act expresses our national commitment to a free market economy in which competition free from private and governmental restraints leads to the best results for consumers.” http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm#file
Clearly the governmental restraint are in violation of a free market economy and is criminal negligence on the part of the liberal politicians who are the real cartel that profit in taxes more then 3 to 1 to the oil companies that actually work for their money and then have to pay taxes on top of that. So when Oil profits go up the tax revenue increase is 3 times that of the oil companies. So who do you think is the real cartel???
This criminal incompetence of the democrats and legislative politicians anti free market energy economy in allowing American companies to meet American Oil needs is in need of change and with bush opening up offshore drilling it is time that we conservatives take a page from the left wing play book and for us to us the judicial system in upholding our laws and open up drilling.
Why dose the Senate call for investigations on big oil? Because they are trying to transfer the blame off of them by placing the blame on someone else. By placing the blame on the oil companies and keep people from seeing that government is the true problem they are able to offer false hope in an effort to gain more power and money from taxes while eliminating a free market economy in our country and forcing us to send our money to unfriendly Middle Eastern countries.
Why should we drill?
1) Create more high paying jobs for Americans
2) Become energy independent and stop sending $700 billion to middle eastern countries that support terrorism
3) Invest the $700 billion in America
4) $700 billion is 6% of the yearly US economy, and investing this in America would do what to our economy? Lower inflation and strengthen the US dollar?
5) Instantly drop the price of oil because oil Speculators like me would invest in commodity producers that provide the product like Exxon, Chevron, BP, Shell, because this is the smart investment. When Oil Speculators transfer investments the Oil price falls on the stock market.
You must be logged in to post a comment.